News by sections

News by region
Issue archives
Archive section
Emerging talent
Emerging talent profiles
Domicile guidebook
Guidebook online
Search site
Features
Interviews
Domicile profiles
Generic business image for news article Image: Shutterstock

08 August 2019
Arizona
Reporter Rebecca Delaney

Artex granted motion to dismiss class action lawsuit

Artex Risk Solutions and other captive insurance providers have secured a victory in a class action lawsuit at the US District Court for the District of Arizona—Phoenix Division.

A group of defendants, including Artex, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co, TSA Holdings and Tribeca Strategic Advisors, were accused of a widespread captive insurance “conspiracy”.

Plaintiffs Dimitri Shivkov et al contended that the companies’ had devised a conspiracy to promote and sell tax-advantaged captive strategies that were viewed as illegal, according to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which disallowed the offered tax benefits.

Shivkov and others who entered into captive agreements with the named defendants brought several claims, including breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, disgorgement, and civil conspiracy.

However, all agreements signed by the plaintiffs included an ‘Arbitration Clause’ stipulating that any dispute between the relevant parties that could not be resolved through Arizona mediation would be arbitrated by the American Arbitration Association.

Furthermore, the agreements also included a ‘Limitation of Liability’, which details that “Artex shall have no liability to [the plaintiffs] for any losses, claims, demands, damages, liabilities, costs or expenses arising from [...] this agreement”.

Therefore, Artex argued that the claims should be arbitrated individually under this clause; because all claims in this lawsuit are barred by the Arbitration Clause, individual arbitration would inevitably lead to a dismissal of the action.

Shivkov argued against individual arbitration on the basis that the clause was unenforceable because: Artex breached their fiduciary duty; the Arbitration Clause is both “substantively and procedurally unconscionable”; the terms of the clause are beyond reasonable expectations’ and the clause was terminated along with the agreements.

Senior US district judge Stephen McNamee delivered the court order to grant Artex’s renewed joint motion to compel individual arbitrations, thus dismissing the action in its entirety as all claims in the suit are barred by the aforementioned Arbitration Clause.

A statement from Artex Risk Solutions stated: “On 5 August the judge in the Shivkov putative class action lawsuit issued an order for individual arbitration. This is the most recent ruling in the lawsuit related to our 831(b) captive business. We have disclosed the ongoing IRS audit and related customer litigation involving our 831(b) captive management business in our SEC filings and to our clients.”

“As stated in December when the original filing was made, we believe it has no merit and will deal with it accordingly. Gallagher and Artex have successfully defended individual claims involving similar allegations.”

“831(b) captives are important insurance vehicles that have been part of the Internal Revenue’s code for decades. Gallagher and Artex have diligently and consistently striven to comply with the legal requirements in forming and managing captive insurance companies.”

Error querying database